Mercurial > repos > fubar > bigwig_outlier_bed
comparison README.md @ 0:c71db540eb38 draft
planemo upload for repository https://github.com/jackh726/bigtools commit ce6b9f638ebcebcad5a5b10219f252962f30e5cc-dirty
author | fubar |
---|---|
date | Mon, 01 Jul 2024 02:48:46 +0000 |
parents | |
children | eb17eb8a3658 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
-1:000000000000 | 0:c71db540eb38 |
---|---|
1 ## bigwig peak outlier to bed | |
2 | |
3 ### July 30 2024 for the VGP | |
4 | |
5 This code will soon become a Galaxy tool, for building some of the [NIH MARBL T2T assembly polishing](https://github.com/marbl/training) tools as Galaxy workflows. | |
6 | |
7 The next JBrowse2 tool release will include a plugin for optional colours to distinguish bed features, shown being tested in the screenshots below. | |
8 | |
9 ### Find and mark BigWig peaks to a bed file for display | |
10 | |
11 In the spirit of DeepTools, but finding contiguous regions where the bigwig value is either above or below a given centile. | |
12 0.99 and 0.01 for example. These quantile cut point values are found and applied over each chromosome using some [cunning numpy code](http://gregoryzynda.com/python/numpy/contiguous/interval/2019/11/29/contiguous-regions.html) | |
13 | |
14 ![image](https://github.com/fubar2/bigwig_peak_bed/assets/6016266/cdee3a2b-ae31-4282-b744-992c15fb49db) | |
15 | |
16 ![image](https://github.com/fubar2/bigwig_peak_bed/assets/6016266/59d1564b-0c34-42a3-b437-44332cf1b2f0) | |
17 | |
18 Big differences between chromosomes 14,15,21,22 and Y in this "all contigs" view - explanations welcomed: | |
19 | |
20 ![image](https://github.com/fubar2/bigwig_peak_bed/assets/6016266/162bf681-2977-4eb8-8d6f-9dad5b3931f8) | |
21 | |
22 | |
23 [pybedtools](https://github.com/jackh726/bigtools) is used for the bigwig interface. Optionally allow | |
24 multiple bigwigs to be processed into a single bed - the bed features have the bigwig name in the label for viewing. | |
25 | |
26 ### Note on quantiles per chromosome rather than quantiles for the whole bigwig | |
27 | |
28 It is just not feasible to hold all contigs in the entire decoded bigwig in RAM to estimate quantiles. It may be | |
29 better to sample across all chromosomes so as not to lose any systematic differences between them - the current method will hide those | |
30 differences unfortunately. Sampling might be possible. Looking at the actual quantile values across a couple of test bigwigs suggests that | |
31 there is not much variation between chromosomes but there's now a tabular report to check them for each input bigwig. |