comparison hyphy_fel.xml @ 9:8389039f7fbc draft

"planemo upload for repository https://github.com/galaxyproject/tools-iuc/tree/master/tools/hyphy/ commit 751182d5067ac8378199058d9152ebfcaeb4c4b5"

8:6400b683aced

            --branches '$branches'
            --srv '$include_srv'
            --pvalue '$p_value'
            --output '$fel_output'
            > '$fel_log'
    ]]></command>
    <inputs>
        <expand macro="inputs"/>
        <expand macro="gencode"/>
        <expand macro="branches"/>

        </test>
    </tests>
    <help><![CDATA[
FEL : Fixed effects likelihood
==============================
    
What question does this method answer?
--------------------------------------

Which site(s) in a gene are subject to pervasive, i.e. consistently across the entire phylogeny, diversifying selection?

Recommended Applications
------------------------

The phenomenon of pervasive selection is generally most prevalent in pathogen evolution and any biological system influenced by evolutionary arms race dynamics 
(or balancing selection), including adaptive immune escape by viruses. As such, FEL is ideally suited to identify sites under positive selection which 
represent candidate sites subject to strong selective pressures across the entire phylogeny. 

FEL is our recommended method for analyzing small-to-medium size datasets when one wishes only to study pervasive selection at individual sites.

Brief description
-----------------

determine if beta != alpha at a site. The estimates aggregate
information over all branches, so the signal is derived from pervasive
diversification or conservation. A subset of branches can be selected
for testing as well, in which case an additional (nuisance) parameter
will be inferred -- the non-synonymous rate on branches NOT selected for
testing. 


Input
-----

Tool options
------------

::

    --code              Which genetic code to use 

    --branches          Which branches should be tested for selection?
                            All [default] : test all branches
                        
                            Internal : test only internal branches (suitable for 
                            intra-host pathogen evolution for example, where terminal branches
                            may contain polymorphism data)
                        
                            Leaves: test only terminal (leaf) branches
                        
                            Unlabeled: if the Newick string is labeled using the {} notation,
                            test only branches without explicit labels 
                            (see http://hyphy.org/tutorials/phylotree/)    
                        
     --pvalue           The significance level used to determine significance
 
     --srv              Include site-to-site synonymous rate variation?
                            Yes [default] or No



                            
]]>

    </help>
    
    <expand macro="citations">
        <citation type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msi105</citation>
    </expand>
</tool>

9:8389039f7fbc

            --branches '$branches'
            --srv '$include_srv'
            --pvalue '$p_value'
            --output '$fel_output'
            > '$fel_log'
            ;
        @CATCH_MPIERR@
    ]]></command>
    <inputs>
        <expand macro="inputs"/>
        <expand macro="gencode"/>
        <expand macro="branches"/>

        </test>
    </tests>
    <help><![CDATA[
FEL : Fixed effects likelihood
==============================

What question does this method answer?
--------------------------------------

Which site(s) in a gene are subject to pervasive, i.e. consistently across the entire phylogeny, diversifying selection?

Recommended Applications
------------------------

The phenomenon of pervasive selection is generally most prevalent in pathogen evolution and any biological system influenced by evolutionary arms race dynamics
(or balancing selection), including adaptive immune escape by viruses. As such, FEL is ideally suited to identify sites under positive selection which
represent candidate sites subject to strong selective pressures across the entire phylogeny.

FEL is our recommended method for analyzing small-to-medium size datasets when one wishes only to study pervasive selection at individual sites.

Brief description
-----------------

determine if beta != alpha at a site. The estimates aggregate
information over all branches, so the signal is derived from pervasive
diversification or conservation. A subset of branches can be selected
for testing as well, in which case an additional (nuisance) parameter
will be inferred -- the non-synonymous rate on branches NOT selected for
testing.


Input
-----

Tool options
------------

::

    --code              Which genetic code to use

    --branches          Which branches should be tested for selection?
                            All [default] : test all branches

                            Internal : test only internal branches (suitable for
                            intra-host pathogen evolution for example, where terminal branches
                            may contain polymorphism data)

                            Leaves: test only terminal (leaf) branches

                            Unlabeled: if the Newick string is labeled using the {} notation,
                            test only branches without explicit labels
                            (see http://hyphy.org/tutorials/phylotree/)

     --pvalue           The significance level used to determine significance

     --srv              Include site-to-site synonymous rate variation?
                            Yes [default] or No




]]>

    </help>

    <expand macro="citations">
        <citation type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msi105</citation>
    </expand>
</tool>