diff test-data/output_file2.tabular @ 19:2e9f7ea7ae93 draft

planemo upload for repository https://github.com/monikaheinzl/duplexanalysis_galaxy/tree/master/tools/hd commit dfaab79252a858e8df16bbea3607ebf1b6962e5a-dirty
author mheinzl
date Mon, 08 Oct 2018 05:56:04 -0400
parents
children
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/test-data/output_file2.tabular	Mon Oct 08 05:56:04 2018 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+Test_data2
+number of tags per file	20 (from 20) against 20
+
+Hamming distance separated by family size
+	FS=1	FS=2	FS=3	FS=4	FS=5-10	FS>10	sum	
+HD=1	2	0	0	0	1	0	3	
+HD=6	0	0	0	1	0	1	2	
+HD=7	2	0	1	1	2	1	7	
+HD=8	1	0	1	0	2	1	5	
+HD=9	1	0	0	0	0	1	2	
+HD=10	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	
+sum	7	0	2	2	5	4	20	
+
+Family size distribution separated by Hamming distance
+	HD=1	HD=2	HD=3	HD=4	HD=5-8	HD>8	sum	
+FS=1	2	0	0	0	3	2	7	
+FS=3	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	
+FS=4	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	
+FS=5	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	
+FS=6	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	
+FS=7	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	
+FS=8	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	
+FS=9	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	
+FS=12	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	
+FS=13	0	0	0	0	1	1	2	
+sum	3	0	0	0	14	3	20	
+
+
+max. family size:	13
+absolute frequency:	2
+relative frequency:	0.1
+
+The hamming distances were calculated by comparing each half of all tags against the tag(s) with the minimum Hamming distance per half.
+It is possible that one tag can have the minimum HD from multiple tags, so the sample size in this calculation differs from the sample size entered by the user.
+actual number of tags with min HD = 79 (sample size by user = 20)
+length of one part of the tag = 12
+
+Hamming distance of each half in the tag
+	HD a	HD b'	HD b	HD a'	HD a+b	sum	
+HD=0	20	0	0	5	0	25	
+HD=1	22	4	4	3	8	41	
+HD=2	9	2	0	9	2	22	
+HD=3	0	0	0	10	0	10	
+HD=4	0	0	2	1	0	3	
+HD=5	0	0	5	0	0	5	
+HD=6	0	5	7	0	3	15	
+HD=7	0	7	10	0	10	27	
+HD=8	0	6	0	0	10	16	
+HD=9	0	7	0	0	17	24	
+HD=10	0	11	0	0	13	24	
+HD=11	0	8	0	0	7	15	
+HD=12	0	1	0	0	5	6	
+HD=13	0	0	0	0	4	4	
+sum	51	51	28	28	79	237	
+
+Absolute delta Hamming distances within the tag
+	FS=1	FS=2	FS=3	FS=4	FS=5-10	FS>10	sum	
+diff=1	5	0	0	1	5	0	11	
+diff=2	4	0	0	0	0	0	4	
+diff=3	1	0	2	1	1	0	5	
+diff=4	1	0	1	0	2	1	5	
+diff=5	2	0	0	0	4	6	12	
+diff=6	1	0	0	1	1	7	10	
+diff=7	2	0	1	0	0	0	3	
+diff=8	0	0	1	0	1	3	5	
+diff=9	6	0	0	1	3	4	14	
+diff=10	4	0	0	0	3	2	9	
+diff=11	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	
+sum	26	0	5	4	20	24	79	
+
+Chimera analysis: relative delta Hamming distances
+	FS=1	FS=2	FS=3	FS=4	FS=5-10	FS>10	sum	
+diff=0.1	1	0	0	1	1	0	3	
+diff=0.3	3	0	2	0	0	0	5	
+diff=0.4	1	0	0	1	3	0	5	
+diff=0.5	0	0	1	0	0	1	2	
+diff=0.6	1	0	0	0	3	7	11	
+diff=0.7	1	0	0	0	1	5	7	
+diff=0.8	10	0	0	0	2	9	21	
+diff=1.0	9	0	2	2	10	2	25	
+sum	26	0	5	4	20	24	79	
+
+Chimeras:
+All tags were filtered: only those tags where at least one half is identical with the half of the min. tag are kept.
+So the hamming distance of the non-identical half is compared.
+Hamming distances of non-zero half
+	FS=1	FS=2	FS=3	FS=4	FS=5-10	FS>10	sum	
+HD=1	4	0	0	0	4	0	8	
+HD=2	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	
+HD=6	0	0	0	1	0	2	3	
+HD=7	1	0	1	0	0	0	2	
+HD=8	0	0	1	0	1	0	2	
+HD=9	1	0	0	1	2	0	4	
+HD=10	1	0	0	0	3	0	4	
+sum	9	0	2	2	10	2	25	
+
+