Mercurial > repos > devteam > bwa_wrappers
diff tool-data/bwa_index.loc.sample @ 0:ffa8aaa14f7c draft
Uploaded initial tarball.
author | devteam |
---|---|
date | Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:53:48 -0400 |
parents | |
children |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/tool-data/bwa_index.loc.sample Fri Sep 28 13:53:48 2012 -0400 @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +#This is a sample file distributed with Galaxy that enables tools +#to use a directory of BWA indexed sequences data files. You will need +#to create these data files and then create a bwa_index.loc file +#similar to this one (store it in this directory) that points to +#the directories in which those files are stored. The bwa_index.loc +#file has this format (longer white space characters are TAB characters): +# +#<unique_build_id> <dbkey> <display_name> <file_path> +# +#So, for example, if you had phiX indexed stored in +#/depot/data2/galaxy/phiX/base/, +#then the bwa_index.loc entry would look like this: +# +#phiX174 phiX phiX Pretty /depot/data2/galaxy/phiX/base/phiX.fa +# +#and your /depot/data2/galaxy/phiX/base/ directory +#would contain phiX.fa.* files: +# +#-rw-r--r-- 1 james universe 830134 2005-09-13 10:12 phiX.fa.amb +#-rw-r--r-- 1 james universe 527388 2005-09-13 10:12 phiX.fa.ann +#-rw-r--r-- 1 james universe 269808 2005-09-13 10:12 phiX.fa.bwt +#...etc... +# +#Your bwa_index.loc file should include an entry per line for each +#index set you have stored. The "file" in the path does not actually +#exist, but it is the prefix for the actual index files. For example: +# +#phiX174 phiX phiX174 /depot/data2/galaxy/phiX/base/phiX.fa +#hg18canon hg18 hg18 Canonical /depot/data2/galaxy/hg18/base/hg18canon.fa +#hg18full hg18 hg18 Full /depot/data2/galaxy/hg18/base/hg18full.fa +#/orig/path/hg19.fa hg19 hg19 /depot/data2/galaxy/hg19/base/hg19.fa +#...etc... +# +#Note that for backwards compatibility with workflows, the unique ID of +#an entry must be the path that was in the original loc file, because that +#is the value stored in the workflow for that parameter. That is why the +#hg19 entry above looks odd. New genomes can be better-looking. +#